Verbes du troisième groupe
French grammarians classify verbs into three categories:
- Verbes du premier groupe / la première conjugaison – "regular" -er verbs
- Verbes du deuxième groupe / la deuxième conjugaison – regular -ir verbs
- Verbes du troisième groupe / verbes irréguliers – irregular verbs
I don’t like this system at all, because two of the categories are far too broad. Verbes du premier groupe includes regular -er verbs, spelling change verbs, and stem-changing verbs. Though they do take the same verb endings, I simply cannot agree that the latter are regular. And verbes du troisième groupe is enormous: it includes aller, envoyer, irregular -ir verbs, and all -re verbs – it’s just a big mishmash.
Learning verb conjugations is all about finding patterns, and there are a lot that get lost in such huge, catch-all categories. So I find it helpful to use my own system:
| Regular -er verbs | Irregular -er verbs | |
| Regular -ir verbs | Irregular -ir verbs | |
| Regular -re verbs | Irregular -re verbs |
What do you think?
Related lessons
Share / Tweet / Pin Me!
Loading your Kwiz
This free website is created with love and a great deal of work.
Your way is the way verbs were categorised when I learnt French at school in the 60s. It worked for me and I have remembered the regular verbs to this day – and a lot of the irregular ones.
Bonjour John,
Thanks for your comment. When I said “French grammarians” I was referring to native French speakers – see Le Bon Usage, Bescherelle, etc. You’re right that most grammars written by English speakers talk about regular -re verbs as well.
Hi Laura I’m surprised at your premise for this article because all the French grammar that I’ve ever been taught, and the text books/grammar books that I’ve looked at or referred to have essentially divided verbs into four categories: regular -er, regular -ir, regular -re, and then all irregulars lumped together. And that’s true going right back to my schooldays which is a very long time ago. My language is English(UK). I agree with you that a three category classification is daft. Best regards.